Does a working paper from economics professor at Johns Hopkins University show lockdowns were ineffective against COVID-19? Explanation by epidemiologist Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, @GidMK, reviews why it did not.

Dr. Barry Dworkin

Medical Mythbusting Commentary for February 10, 2022

Does a working paper from economics professor at Johns Hopkins University show lockdowns were ineffective against COVID-19? Explanation by epidemiologist Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz @GidMK reviews why it did not. Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Source:
Did So-Called ‘Johns Hopkins Study’ Really Show Lockdowns Were Ineffective Against Covid-19?

Review:

Related posts:

  1. Preparing for Covid-19. What to do and what to avoid.
  2. Measles now endemic in Europe: The predictable outcome of ignorance, fake data, and anti-science
  3. Observational study suggests that one-fifth of Covid-19 patients get a psychiatric diagnosis within 90 days. Many factors confound the results. Need more evidence and biological mechanism to determine if there is a causal link.
  4. NY Times: Fully vaccinated people have a 1 in 5,000 to 10,000 chance of a COVID breakthrough infection on any given day. So, less than many of the daily risks we accept without a second thought. #vaccineswork
Bitnami